Digital Mind 🧠

🪵 The Threshold

Perceived similarity to a racial category drives self-categorization among mixed-race people

Properties2
tagsja-picks, xref, question, factual_claims, primary_study, corroborated, category/factual-claims
aliases@huang2025mixed, loc. 37, @huang2025mixed, loc. 54

4 min read

Perceived similarity to a racial category drives self-categorization among mixed-race people

Evidence

The assumption of such a directional relationship between similarity and self-categorization has been empirically supported by Good et al. (2010), who report that higher self-perceived similarity to a category leads to stronger self-categorization in a sample of mixed-race Minority-White participants in the United States. — Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or Neither, 37

In a restricted frame of reference (Figure 1a), the difference between Target A and the Mixed individual is salient, and Target A is contrasted away from the self. Consequently, the Mixed individual may categorize Target A into the outgroup, specifically as White, and may self-categorize as Asian or Mixed instead. When the frame of reference extends to more extreme (i.e., prototypical) positions (Figures 1b,c), Target A may be assimilated to the self and the perceived relative similarity between the Mixed individual and Target A may increase. The resulting self-categorization may change depending on the direction of the frame of reference extension: In an all-Asian context (Figure 1b), Mixed individuals may be more inclined to categorize themselves and Target A as White. Conversely, in an all-White context (Figure 1c), they may be more likely to categorize themselves and Target A as Asian. — Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or Neither, 54

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects directly to reader’s stated interest in how entitativity/ingroup pressures bear on internally heterogeneous members — the frame-of-reference contrast mechanism is the flip side of ingroup prototype pull. — connects to: Mixed-race individuals use their own observable behavior as similarity evidence when self-categorizing racially. — Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or…, 42; Racial categorization of the same person varies by time, place, and context; Mixed-identity people shift self-categorizations situationally because prototype-similarity assessments stay inconclusive — Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or…, 60 (+9 more)
  • QUESTION: Might be worth chasing: what moderates the switch from self-categorizing as Mixed vs. the polar option? The passage only allows two opposite binary shifts.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or…, 37; Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or…, 54

Broader Connections

✉️

Backlinks