Participation in religious ritual, not broader psychological traits, predicts sacred values.

Evidence

The extent of participation in religious ritual was correlated with the number of reported sacred values: r = .10, t(326) = 1.76, pone-tailed = .040. Notably, neither the need for closure measure nor the disgust sensitivity measure were positively correlated with the sacred value score, t(311) = βˆ’1.31, pone-tailed = . and t(317) = βˆ’1.07, pone-tailed = .857, respectively. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 26

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly continues the reader’s thread on the threat-to-sacralization pathway β€” ritual participation, not need-for-closure or disgust, driving sacred values narrows the causal account to participation itself. β€” connects to: Merely reminding Muslims of their religiosity increases how many values they call sacred β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 37; Sacred values can form quickly through ritual and perceived group threat. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 8; Participation in religious ritual creates sacred values, especially under group threat. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 16 (+5 more)
  • QUESTION: Why would need-for-closure and disgust sensitivity have no predictive power here? They might matter in initial belief formation but not in the value-sacralization of an already-held cause.

Broader Connections