Merely reminding Muslims of their religiosity increases how many values they call sacred

Evidence

There was a reliable effect of condition on the number of sacred values, t(39.51) = βˆ’1.90, pone-tailed= .033, d = 0.53. As expected, people who were reminded of their religiosity beforehand reported more sacred values (M = 15.85, SD = 3.11) than those who were not (M = 13.50, SD = 5.49). This finding held even when six items containing explicit religious content (e.g., mandatory school prayers) were excluded from the sacred values measure: t(43.56) = βˆ’1.85, pone-tailed = .036, d = 0.51. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 37

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly extends the reader’s threat-to-sacralization and Atran sacred-values line: here a mere identity prime (not threat) inflates the number of sacred values declared, hinting that professed sacredness is partly a state-sensitive identity performance rather than a fixed internal commitment. β€” connects to: Merely reminding people of religious ritual raises how many sacred values they claim. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 30; Religious ritual participation increases sacred values even on non-religious topics. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 29; Participation in religious ritual creates sacred values, especially under group threat. β€” Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Alin Coman and Scott Atran, Religion, group threat and sacred values, 16 (+3 more)
  • QUESTION: The effect inflates COUNT but not necessarily conviction strength or downstream refusal β€” does verbal sacred-value-claiming under prime predict actual behavioral willingness to sacrifice or fuse with the group?

Broader Connections