Non-interventionist governments were forced into greater intervention

Evidence

On the reverse side of the coin, governments ideologically com­ mitted to non-intervention and fiscal conservatism have been forced by events to be more rather than less interventionist. Laying aside the degree to which the evident insecurities of flexible accumulation create a climate conducive to authoritarianism of the Thatcher­ Reagan type, financial instability and the massive problems of internal and external indebtedness have forced periodic interventions in un­ stable financial markets. — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity, 1030

Categorization

• XREF: Resonates with flexible accumulation’s contradictions in Harvey’s larger thesis; also connects to bailouts and state rescues in later crises. — connects to: Non-intervention fails if rival powers still intervene in the region — Bernard Lewis, From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting…, 1199; Austerity is state intervention transferring resources from the many to the few — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism: An Intervention, 195; Law-and-order ideology legitimizes state intervention in crises (+3 more)

Broader Connections

• Non-intervention fails if rival powers still intervene in the region #corroborates (0.82) — Bernard Lewis, From Babel to Dragomans, 1199
• Neoliberalism strengthens repressive state apparatuses rather than shrinking government #corroborates (0.78) — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 1748
• Austerity is state intervention transferring resources from the many to the few #exemplifies (0.75) — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 195
• Demographic explosion and industrialization forced power beyond sovereignty #corroborates (0.74) — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 264
• Law-and-order ideology legitimizes state intervention in crises #corroborates (0.73)
• A government can manufacture crisis to construct its own people as enemy #corroborates (0.72) — , The Braided Reading EPUB, 111