Neoliberal reforms pushed states toward authoritarian repression to enforce unpopular policies

Evidence

That neoliberalism tends to produce authoritarianism was a lesson learnt in the Global South long before the recent rise of right-wing authoritarianism in Europe and the United States. As the imposition of neoliberal reforms by international financial institutions eroded states’ ‘political capacity to govern’, these same states often relied more heavily on repression in order to implement unpopular economic policies. In the postcolony, the ‘crumbling’ of the independence and sovereignty for which anticolonialists had fought subjected these states to the ‘tutelage of international creditors’, severing the ties between citizenship and rights to public services. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 452

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the postcolonial dependence literature (Rodney, Fanon) and to current debates on ‘authoritarian liberalism’ in EU governance; also echoes the Kinyanjui/Ngugi critique of creditor tutelage. — connects to: Neoliberalism expands state penal power while professing to shrink government — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 179; Neoliberals needed Chile’s dictatorship to find the means to depoliticize economies. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 301; Italian economists equated strong government with authoritarian repression to protect markets. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 1181 (+10 more)

Broader Connections