Neoliberalism operates as a soft totalitarianism with choice rhetoric but no real choice

Evidence

What’s more of an issue is the kind of soft totalitarianism of neoliberal dictatorship, isn’t it? I don’t use those terms lightly. This situation where people — where there’s a rhetoric of choice and no effective political choice, where there’s a general kind of helplessness and people feel they’ve got no control over their lives — it seems to me that these are what we need to fight against. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 2180

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Fisher’s concise definition of ‘soft totalitarianism’: formal freedom of choice with no effective political alternatives and pervasive helplessness.
  • XREF: connects to: Ordoliberal and public-choice strands of neoliberalism explicitly reject Friedman’s natural-liberty rhetoric — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 353; Neoliberalism is a self-consciously evolving thought collective, not a fixed catechism — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 141; Neoliberalism governs through guilt and debt rather than the body — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New…, 53 (+8 more)

Broader Connections