Neoliberalism centrally requires a strong state, not state retreat

Evidence

Critical studies of neoliberalism had begun in the 1990s with the basic contention that the ideology meant the rollback of the state and the return of laissez-faire: a market fundamentalism, which purportedly dictated the liberation of markets and the transformation of every member of the world’s population into homo economicus. The scholarship evolved in the early 2000s to clarify that neoliberalism in both theory and practice actually meant a “strong state and free market” with a “roll-out” (Peck) of a new form of state to match its rollback. — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 17

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reading purpose: this overturns the crude ‘neoliberalism equals small government’ caricature the reader wants fractured. Also echoes Mirowski’s earlier chapters on the strong-state thesis. — connects to: Neoliberalism seeks to capture and reconstruct the strong state, not shrink it — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 117; Neoliberalism requires active state intervention to build competitive order, unlike laissez-faire. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 44; Flexibility, not a fixed policy list, defines the neoliberal program’s core — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 206 (+12 more)

Broader Connections