Nationalism must be read against prior cultural systems, not political ideologies

Evidence

I am not claiming that the appearance of nationalism towards the end of the eighteenth century was ‘produced’ by the erosion of religious certainties, or that this erosion does not itself require a complex explanation. Nor am I suggesting that somehow nationalism historically ‘supersedes’ religion. What I am proposing is that nationalism has to be understood by aligning it, not with self-consciously held political ideologies, but with the large cultural systems that preceded it, out of which – as well as against which – it came into being. — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 58

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Methodological positioning: nationalism as emerging from religious and dynastic cultural systems rather than from liberal/Marxist ideology — a foundational move against the ‘invention of nationalism as ideology’ reading.
  • XREF: This anti-ideological framing of nationalism scaffolds later readings of how Muslim identity is or is not ‘national’ in the Islamophobia literature — the imagined community frame meeting religious identity. — connects to: Nationalism is modern in fact but ancient in claim, universal and particular — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 35; A cultural tradition can substitute for a weak tradition of national political unity; Marxism’s dismissal of culture left it unequipped for nationalism (+4 more)

Broader Connections

  • A cultural tradition can substitute for a weak tradition of national political unity #expands (0.85)
  • Marxism’s dismissal of culture left it unequipped for nationalism #expands (0.75)