National identity is built on manufactured ancestral myth, not primordial history.

Evidence

The Vijaya myth is now taught in schools, so that most Sinhalese children consider it indisputable history. As Renan also has observed: “Of all cults, that of the ancestors is the most legitimate, for the ancestors have made us what we are. A heroic past, great men, glory, … this is the social capital upon which one bases a national idea” (Renan 1996: 52). The Vijaya myth provides much of that, as do other myths and dubious historical episodes that have helped foster a modern Sinhalese Buddhist identity antithetical to the tolerance espoused by Buddhism. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology, 74

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to reader’s core question of whether group solidarity rests on constructed origin stories — echoes Renan and parallels Hobsbawm’s invented traditions framework. — connects to: Sri Lankan ethnic claims rest on manufactured mytho-history, not primordial identity. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 718; National identities are imagined modern constructs rather than primordial bonds; National identity penetrates populations only through a concept transmitted by institutions, not direct experience (+11 more)
  • QUESTION: Note the paradox flagged: a Buddhist identity built on myth is ‘antithetical to the tolerance espoused by Buddhism’ — worth probing how a nominally tolerant religion sustains an exclusionary nationalist project.

Broader Connections