National attachment reduces rather than increases moral disengagement once glorification is controlled.

Evidence

As expected, there were no effects of condition on minimization or dehumanization, and attachment had, if anything, a diminishing rather than facilitating effect on these strategies controlling for glorification. — Bernhard Leidner et al., Ingroup Glorification, Moral…, 54

Categorization

• QUESTION: Surprising: attachment appears protective when glorification is partialled out — worth chasing whether this structural dissociability replicates across studies and cultures.
• XREF: connects to: Glorification enables moral disengagement while attachment resists in-group wrongdoing justification. — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt: Modes…, 138; Ingroup glorification, not attachment, triggers moral disengagement and reduced justice demands. — Bernhard Leidner et al., Ingroup Glorification, Moral…, 113; Group glorification suppresses justice via moral disengagement whereas attachment does not — Bernhard Leidner et al., Ingroup Glorification, Moral…, 56 (+5 more)

Broader Connections

• Group glorification suppresses justice via moral disengagement whereas attachment does not #corroborates (0.96) — Bernhard Leidner et al., Ingroup Glorification, Moral…, 56
• Glorification enables moral disengagement while attachment resists in-group wrongdoing justification. #corroborates (0.95) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 138
• Attachment to the in-group and glorification predict opposite reactions to one’s group’s moral violations. #corroborates (0.94) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 2
• Ingroup glorification, not attachment, triggers moral disengagement and reduced justice demands. #corroborates (0.92) — Bernhard Leidner et al., Ingroup Glorification, Moral…, 113
• Glorification’s correlation to attachment suppresses attachment’s observable effects. #expands (0.90) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 96
• In-group glorification drives dehumanization and minimization which reduce justice support for own-side atrocities. #corroborates (0.88) — Emanuele Castano, On the Perils of Glorifying the In-group, 54
• Attachment and glorification are distinct facets of national identification. #expands (0.85) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 142
• Glorification and attachment separately predict reactions to national misdeeds #qualifies (0.82) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 90