Muslims resisted both Christian military and missionary efforts throughout the thirteenth century

Evidence

The obduracy of Muslims, who throughout the ages have proved almost unconvertible, was several times stressed, and both theory and missionary practice recognised it. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 742 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

By the end of the thirteenth century and in the following centuries, as the Ottomans obtained hegemony over Anatolia and pushed their way into Europe, few Europeans were optimistic about Christian chances to defeat Islam or to wrest the Holy Land from Muslim control; the calls to crusade were in general for the defense against Ottoman advances into Europe. In this atmosphere, it is the hostile view of Islam of people like Fidentius of Padua that is to dominate European discourse on Islam, rather than the positive portrayal of De statu Sarracenorum or of Burchard of Mount Sion. The “beast” whose imminent demise Innocent III had predicted showed few signs of weakness or defeat; thirteenth-century Muslims proved impervious not only to Christian arms (everywhere but in Spain) but also to Christian missionaries. — John V. Tolan, Saracens, 1093 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Medieval Christian kings legally compelled Muslim and Jewish subjects to attend missionary sermons; Failed crusades eroded European hopes of defeating Islam by 1300; Thirteenth-century crusading and missions failed to convert Muslims or reclaim the Holy Land (+19 more)

Broader Connections