Moral psychology broadened fairness-only models to include purity, hierarchy, and coalition domains.

Evidence

In the last two decades, though, following in particular the impulsion of Richard Shweder (cf. Shweder et al. 1987) and Jonathan Haidt (cf. Haidt et al. 1993), scholars of morality have enlarged their inquiry to a much wider range of normative issues, such as care for the needs of others, coalitional behavior, hierarchical relationship, and issues of purity and impurity. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 687

Categorization

• XREF: This is the classic Moral Foundations Theory move that grounds the reader’s analytical frame about moral domains beyond fairness in the examined period. — connects to: Harm prohibitions are as central to morality as fairness — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 513; Fairness regulates rather than generates the moralized expression of evolved dispositions — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 692; Parochial altruism and self-sacrifice exceed mutualistic fairness models. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 269 (+1 more)

Related

• Harm prohibitions are as central to morality as fairness (similarity 0.86)
• Morality is an evolved sense of fairness, not a late intellectual achievement (similarity 0.85)
• Morality evolved as a propensity for fair cost-benefit sharing among cooperators. (similarity 0.83)
• Morality is about fair cooperation, not maximizing welfare. (similarity 0.83)
• Morality extends beyond fairness among strangers to relational obligations (similarity 0.83)
• Deriving fairness from bargaining power threatens to reduce moral norms to mere bargaining. (similarity 0.81)
• Human morality may rest on a general normativizing capacity, not a dedicated fairness module. (similarity 0.81)
• Mutualistic anthropology explains moral anger as an evolved fairness-restoring mechanism (similarity 0.81)
• Parochial altruism and self-sacrifice exceed mutualistic fairness models. (similarity 0.81)
• Mutualistic cost-benefit logic may explain transcendent moral sentiment. (similarity 0.80)
• Moral fairness may itself have been shaped by natural selection. (similarity 0.80)
• Fairness-based morality is uniquely human despite similar selective conditions in animals. (similarity 0.80)
• Moral norms differ by relationship type, not by one universal strategy. (similarity 0.80)
• Morality evolves from individual partner-choice competition, not group selection. (similarity 0.79)
• Morality may have evolved via partner choice over partner control (similarity 0.79)

Broader Connections

• Morality extends beyond fairness among strangers to relational obligations #expands (0.80) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 333
• Parochial altruism and self-sacrifice exceed mutualistic fairness models. #corroborates (0.78) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 269
• Fairness regulates rather than generates the moralized expression of evolved dispositions #complicates (0.75) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 692