Montesquieu’s discredited climate theory birthed the enduring myth that Eastern peoples suit dictatorship

Evidence

The lack of evolution in Muslim lands was also attributed to “Oriental despotism.” Enlightenment philosopher Montesquieu, writing in 1748, explained that Asia was destined to be despotic because of the way its hot climate affected the temperaments of its people. He argued that in cooler regions such as Europe, the people tended to be active and therefore braver, whereas in the warmer climates of Asia the people were inactive and therefore servile and effeminate. It followed from this that democracy was more at home in the former, while the subservient people of the East were capable only of despotism. While Montesquieu’s climate-based theory, which drew on precursors in the classical era, is long out of style, the notion of “Oriental despotism” and the belief that the people of the MENA region and South Asia are best suited to dictatorships has endured, as shown in Chapter 3. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 172

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the vault’s Orientalism cluster — Montesquieu’s climate logic is the genealogy behind Said’s and Razack’s claims about imperial ‘despotism’ framing. — connects to: Montesquieu’s climate theory of Oriental despotism still shapes Western views today; The claim that Muslims cannot self-govern descends from Montesquieu’s climate theory.; The West-civilizes-the-Eastern-despot claim chains climate theory through Orientalism to modernization theory (+1 more)
  • QUESTION: Worth later checking how much modern ‘Arab exceptionalism’ arguments about democracy draw directly on this Montesquieu lineage.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of
, 172

Broader Connections