Mixed White-Black research insufficiently captures other Multiracial groups’ experiences

Evidence

Although scholarship that focuses exclusively on mixed White- Black persons is valuable and insightful, it does not fully capture the unique and lived experiences of different Multiracial populations. … Following Root’s lead, this paper focuses exclusively on the research literature of other racially mixed people (e.g., Latinx-White; Asian-Latinx) to examine similarities and differences in how other racially mixed categories of people experience their Multiraciality and how this is shaped by peers and others in one’s social sphere of influence. — Tatiana I. Zamora and Amado M. Padilla, Making sense of conflicting messages of…, 40

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s reading purpose on when protective solidarity’s homogenizing pressure backfires against internally heterogeneous members — this shows multiracial scholarship itself often homogenizes by defaulting to White-Black as the exemplar. — connects to: Black-white biracial people dominate multiracial research while other mixes go unstudied. — Tatiana I. Zamora and Amado M. Padilla, Making sense of conflicting messages of…, 52; Aggregating distinct Multiracial groups as one category erases their differing experiences. — Tatiana I. Zamora and Amado M. Padilla, Making sense of conflicting messages of…, 51; Evidence on minority-to-minority prejudice is mixed and understudied — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 970 (+1 more)
  • SHARE: Worth flagging to anyone working in multiracial studies: the field’s own methodological default to White-Black is a form of internal erasure.

Broader Connections