Black-white biracial people dominate multiracial research while other mixes go unstudied.

Evidence

Since Multiracial identity was first formally recognized and included in the 2000 U. S. Census, the literature in this review reflects Multiracial identity development from that year forward. … Research articles on white/Black mixed race are excluded from this systematic review because this category represents the most researched group to date. — Tatiana I. Zamora and Amado M. Padilla, Making sense of conflicting messages of…, 52

Categorization

• QUESTION: The 2000 Census formal recognition is a sharp historical anchor — worth chasing whether the category’s bureaucratic construction is itself the origin of the homogenizing comparison class the reader studies.
• XREF: connects to: Mixed White-Black research insufficiently captures other Multiracial groups’ experiences — Tatiana I. Zamora and Amado M. Padilla, Making sense of conflicting messages of…, 40; Academic study of race long ignored whiteness as an unexamined norm. — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 643

Broader Connections

• Academic study of race long ignored whiteness as an unexamined norm. #expands (0.82) — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 643