Misreading Hegel stems from constructed reading habits, not inadequate education

Evidence

Hegel begins with the ordinary practice of reading and understanding philosophical writing. He reminds us of one ‘particular complaint often made against philosophical writings, that so much has to be read over and over again before it can be understood’. Now, as he interprets this, if the reader of a philosophical text generally does not understand what he or she has read, this is not the fault of an inadequate education. The work remains incomprehensible even for an individual ‘who otherwise possesses the intellectual and cultural conditions required to understand it’. The problem lies instead in the way the reader’s ordinary habits of reading and understanding have been constructed. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1195

Categorization

Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims

  • QUESTION: Hegel anticipates the idea that comprehension failure is structural to the reader’s habit rather than cognitive deficiency — worth chasing what ‘constructed habits’ means for pedagogy.