Medieval Islam and Christendom were structurally opposite societies

Evidence

Western Christendom and Islam not only represented two distinct systems of religion; they were societies extraordinarily unlike from almost every point of view. For the greater part of the Middle Ages and over most of its area, the West formed a society primarily agrarian, feudal, and monastic, at a time when the strength of Islam lay in its great cities, wealthy courts, and long lines of communication. To Western ideals essentially celibate, sacerdotal, and hierarchical, Islam opposed the outlook of a laity frankly indulgent and sensual, in principle egalitarian, enjoying a remarkable freedom of speculation, with no priests and no monasteries built into the basic structure of society as they were in the West. — R. W. Southern, Western Views of Islam in the Middle…, 32

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the earlier claim that Western present-mindedness and blind spots shape how civilizations misread each other. — connects to: Medieval Europeans modeled Muhammad’s Arabia on their own society
  • CANDY: The symmetry — celibate/hierarchical West vs. egalitarian/no-priest Islam — is a clean, quotable contrast.