Medieval Christian writers uniformly stressed Muhammad’s orphaned poverty
Evidence
In all the accounts of Muhammad’s life which have some relation to reality, but omitting the wholly fabulous, two consistent themes dominate all that is said. Muhammad was violent; he levied war and ordered assassinations unscrupulously for private ends, for plunder, and even more for ambition. Secondly, he was subject to human frailty; he had his ups and downs, a history which revealed the ordinary fluctuations of fortune: szcut alu tyrannt. This seemed extremely important to the mediaeval writer whose mind was filled by thoughts of the divinely guaranteed successes of the Jews of the Old Testament. Still more important was the comparison between Muhammad and Christ; although Muslims claimed no divinity for the Prophet, Christians were aware of the contrast at every moment. Muhammad was both wicked and human, and these two points seemed almost equally important. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 552 (
#expands, via linked claim)
The establishment of Islamic power by violence and fraud, by battle, banditry and assassination and by the authority of pretended visions; the intimate and often sordid details of the Prophet’s personal relations with his family; in these cases also the picture was delineated by selecting just those facts that suited it, and ignoring all others. In war, unprotected by angels, Muhammad suffered the ordinary vicissitudes to which soldiers and highwaymen, but not prophets, are liable, and he paid the final debt of humanity more cheaply than he deserved. This is the verdict of the more moderate writers; unfair though it is, it is closer to reality than Muhammad, Cardinal or Mage, or Muhammad devoured by swine. At the worst there was the assertion of the fantastic, and its repetition without discrimination; at the best there was the selection of only those facts that served the purpose of controversy. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1354 (
#expands, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Medieval Christian writers framed Muhammad as both wicked and humanly frail — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 552; Even moderate medieval Christian writers distorted Muhammad by cherry-picking facts — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1354
Related
- Medieval Christian writers framed Muhammad as both wicked and humanly frail (similarity 0.96)
- Even moderate medieval Christian writers distorted Muhammad by cherry-picking facts (similarity 0.92)
- Mediaeval authors often deliberately chose the worst accounts of Muhammad. (similarity 0.89)
- Even ‘moderate’ medieval biographers of Muhammad selected only polemic-serving facts (similarity 0.87)
- Medieval Christian writers widely understood Muhammad as merely a prophet (similarity 0.86)
- Some medieval Christian writers treated Muhammad’s prophecy claims with investigative seriousness, not easy dismissal (similarity 0.84)
- Medieval Christians read Muhammad’s human fallibility itself as disproof of prophecy (similarity 0.84)
- Medieval Christians read Muhammad’s life as a failed imitation of Christ (similarity 0.84)
- Medieval Christian writers sometimes preserved authentic Islamic legends about Muhammad (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval Christian polemics ignored Muhammad’s victories and highlighted only his defeats (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval writers knew Muslims viewed Muhammad as only a prophet (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval polemic attacked Muslim aspects that scandalized Christian observers (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval Christians held Muhammad’s lack of miracles as decisive against his prophethood (similarity 0.82)
- Christian polemicists omitted Muhammad’s peaceful conquests to portray him as a robber (similarity 0.82)
- Medieval Christian writers defined Muhammad’s teaching chiefly as denial of the Trinity. (similarity 0.82)
Broader Connections
- Medieval Christian writers framed Muhammad as both wicked and humanly frail
#expands(0.85) — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 552 - Even moderate medieval Christian writers distorted Muhammad by cherry-picking facts
#expands(0.75) — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1354