Mass protest without a vanguard naturally occupies symbolic space rather than seizing state power

Evidence

This had not been planned, and some participants soon questioned why it happened. Would it not have made more sense to actually charge the halls of power and take control? Should a revolutionary movement not seize the television and radio stations so it can stop the regime from broadcasting its propaganda? It was all right there for the taking. But if they did that, who would have been in charge of deciding what to do with them? This was not a movement led by a revolutionary vanguard; it was a huge mass of individuals that, just days ago, were little more than an event on a Facebook page. In any case, that is not what they did. They took the Square. And they stayed there. — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn, 225

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the book’s overarching thesis about leaderless mass movements and their failure to consolidate gains; resonates with later chapters on the missing revolution. — connects to: Local protest movements can aggregate into a national politics without top-down coordination — Eddie S. Glaude Jr., Democracy in Black: How Race Still…, 620; Horizontal protest movements that refuse representation get co-opted or crushed by existing powers — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and…, 444; Protest events alone do not change anything without ongoing political organization (+10 more)

Broader Connections