Markets can be performatively constructed by agents who are not atomistic homo economicus

Evidence

The study of the CBOE thus allows the question of performativity to be given a precise formulation. Why was option pricing theory so successful empirically? Was it because of the discovery of preexisting price regularities? Or did the theory succeed empirically because participants used it to set option prices? Did it make itself true? As will be seen, the answer is broadly compatible with Callon’s analysis. The CBOE, however, also demonstrates (even in a case favorable to the discovery of performativity) limits to the argument that homo œconomicus, though “not to be found in a natural state,” nevertheless “really does exist” (Callon 1998, p. 51). The very agents who performed option theory were not and did not become atomistic, amoral homines œconomici: if they had, they could not have constructed their market. — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 25

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the core Performativity research question this article sets out to answer, and stakes out the limits of the Callonian framing.
  • SEED: The claim that non-atomistic, embedded, moral agents were precisely what was needed to construct the performative market is a sharp thesis worth an essay: performativity requires community, not atomism.
  • XREF: connects to: A market model can shape markets actively rather than merely describing them — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1165; Market actors are calculative without becoming amoral atomistic egotists — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1186; Economic theory succeeded in derivatives markets partly by making markets conform to it — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 9 (+12 more)

Broader Connections