Economic theory, not trader demand, forged the proposal for the stock-options exchange

Evidence

It seems that reading about this economic analysis of options in the magazine Institutional Investor (Malkiel and Quandt 1968) was what drew the attention of a key member of the CBT, grain trader Edmund O’Connor. Options were desirable but traded only ad hoc: might the CBT not profitably standardize them and trade them in a busy, efficient Chicago pit? To help explore and build legitimacy for this idea, the CBT hired consultants, Robert R. Nathan Associates, who had studied the grain futures market for the Department of Agriculture. Nathan Associates turned to Malkiel, Quandt, and their colleague William Baumol for a report on the impact of an options exchange on “the public interest.” Options, the trio argued, “enrich the investor’s repertoire of strategies by allowing him to realize a different set of payoffs than he would have realized in their absence.” Just as the possibility of carrying an umbrella was an advantage to the pedestrian, “the more strategies are available to the investor, the better off he is likely to be” (Nathan Associates 1969, vol. 2, pp. 14 and 20). — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 63

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly fits the reading purpose on performativity: finance theory making the market it described. Connects to Callon’s notion of economics performing the economy. — connects to: Economic theory succeeded in derivatives markets partly by making markets conform to it — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 9; Economic theory helped restore legitimacy to banned financial derivatives — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 9; Academic theory directly motivated the creation of the organized options exchange — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 651 (+4 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Parallel to how academic/botanical ‘theory’ shaped the tree-infrastructure article: expertise recruited to legitimize an institutional project.

Broader Connections