Maps can construct territory rather than merely represent it

Evidence

In terms of most communication theories and common sense, a map is a scientific abstraction of reality. A map merely represents something which already exists objectively ‘there.’ In the history I have described, this relationship was reversed. A map anticipated spatial reality, not vice versa. In other words, a map was a model for, rather than a model of, what it purported to represent. — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 661

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the calibration vs. adoption theme in the Law Merchant chapters — institutions/norms constructing reality rather than encoding it. — connects to: The map now precedes and engenders the territory, not the reverse — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 6; The Borges map fable now expresses only second-order simulacra — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 5; Reality’s coherence depends on a reserve of un-mapped imaginary territory — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 403 (+7 more)
  • SEED: Essay angle: the map as a technology of sovereignty — how representations create the things they claim to describe, from colonial cartography to modern GIS.