Environmental conflict arises when official extraction-driven landscapes override vernacular community maps

Evidence

In the global resource wars, the environmentalism of the poor is frequently triggered when an official landscape is forcibly imposed on a vernacular one. A vernacular landscape is shaped by the affective, historically textured maps that communities have devised over generations, maps replete with names and routes, maps alive to significant ecological and surface geological features. A vernacular landscape, although neither monolithic nor undisputed, is integral to the socioenvironmental dynamics of community rather than being wholly externalized—treated as out there, as a separate nonrenewable resource. By contrast, an official landscape—whether governmental, NGO, corporate, or some combination of those—is typically oblivious to such earlier maps; instead, it writes the land in a bureaucratic, externalizing, and extraction-driven manner that is often pitilessly instrumental. — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 50

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the official-versus-vernacular landscape distinction that structures the book’s resource-conflict cases.
  • XREF: Connects to the settler-colonial land/place strand in Eco-Justice and to the A Different Shade of Colonialism reading of land control. — connects to: Environmental review documents omit or erase the communities they harm — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 1071; Land-use harms regularly cross property boundaries — Adam Rome, The Bulldozer in the Countryside:…, 947; Environmental degradation of a place is experienced as an attack on community identity — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 232 (+3 more)

Broader Connections