Literature conflating frequency discrimination and FM detection data produces serious confusion

Related

• Frequency-difference and frequency-modulation thresholds must not be conflated in the literature (similarity 0.82)
• A 1 dB detection gain can shift speech identification by 15 to 20 points (similarity 0.82)
• Frequency-discrimination and frequency-modulation thresholds are commonly conflated in the literature (similarity 0.82)
• Each open-end reflection filters out high frequencies until the fundamental remains (similarity 0.81)
• Auditory sensitivity varies nonuniformly across the frequency range (similarity 0.81)
• Dissonance depends on proportional separation falling inside the critical bandwidth, not absolute frequency difference (similarity 0.80)
• Frequency separation between two tones systematically shifts fusion, roughness, then resolution (similarity 0.79)
• Amounts of masking are expressed as dB differences, not absolute dB SPL levels. (similarity 0.79)
• The audiogram only measures sound detection, omitting everything else about auditory perception. (similarity 0.78)
• Hearing thresholds vary individually but share a common perceptual order (similarity 0.78)