Life’s self-transcendence makes time real, unlike analytical separation of tenses

Evidence

Even below the level of intellect one will have to recognize the same form at work both in procreation and in growth: that life at any given moment transcends itself, that its present forms a unity with the “not-yet” of the future. As long as one separates past, present, and future with analytical sharpness, time is unreal, because by this separation only the temporal unextended, that is, the atemporal moment of the present tense, is real. Life, however, is the unique mode of existence for whose reality this distinction does not hold. … For life alone is time real. … Time is the—perhaps abstract—form in our consciousness of life itself, as experienced in unformulable, immediate concreteness. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 809

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s essay frame: the flâneur’s blasĂ© stance as an analytical, tense-separating posture that makes lived time unreal. — connects to: Life alone realizes time by transcending the present in both directions — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 808; Lived life always experiences the present as stretched with past and future — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 803; Life and its cultural forms are fundamentally in tension — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 837 (+15 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: Simmel’s argument that life alone makes time real, collapsing Kantian ideality of time into a mechanistic worldview, is a top-tier synthesis.

Broader Connections