Liberal universalism developed historically alongside imperialism and slavery.

Evidence

In particular, the fact that liberalism, imperialism, and slavery historically developed together, that Locke was involved in American colonial enterprise, that he defends the priority of European agrarian cultivation, are grounds for indictment of him as an ideologist of the expropriation or enslavement of native peoples. This postcolonial critique has been the loudest. Post-liberal feminists, meanwhile, hold that Locke confines women to the private sphere, and that the Lockean state is limited to consenting men in public. These attacks, which followed in the wake of the Marxian unmasking of Locke as a theorist of ‘possessive individualism’, who served ‘bourgeois capitalism’, commonly take the form of elevating Locke into a surrogate of ‘the Enlightenment project’, doubtful though such a construct is. — , Second Treatise of Government and A…, 57

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Is ‘the Enlightenment project’ itself a coherent object, or a construct retrofitted by both its defenders and its postcolonial critics?
  • XREF: connects to: Liberal universalism has long coexisted with justifying empire; Western universalism functions as imperialism from the perspective of non-Western societies — Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the…, 489; Imperialism is the necessary logical consequence of cultural universalism. — Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the…, 860 (+16 more)

Broader Connections