Liberalism is a culture that won, not a culture beyond cultures.

Evidence

The post-Enlightenment, liberal, rational, humanist universalism of Western culture looks not less historically significant but less universal by the minute. Many great ideas—liberty, equality, autonomy, democracy—have been honed within the liberal tradition. However, it is now clear that liberalism is not the “culture that is beyond cultures” but the culture that won: that particularism which successfully universalized and hegemonized itself across the globe. Its triumph in virtually setting the limits to the domain of “the political” was not, in retrospect, the result of a disinterested mass conversion to the Rule of Universal Reason but something closer to a more earthy, Foucauldian, power-knowledge sort of “game.” — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2, 357

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Core conceptual claim for the field: liberalism as hegemonic particularism disguised as universalism.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The ‘culture that won’ formulation reframes the entire liberal-universalism debate in a power-knowledge frame — dense, paradigm-shifting, resists summary.
  • XREF: Builds directly toward how Islamophobia readings treat Western universalism; connects to Said’s Orientalism and Foucault’s power-knowledge. — connects to: Liberal World Government would eliminate authentic politics among peoples; The liberal offer of culture to the excluded aims to pacify, not empower.; Liberal state neutrality presupposes cultural homogeneity among the governed — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 358 (+3 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 357

Broader Connections