Kenyan parties opposed Somali secession for fear of tribal separatism and with Ethiopian backing

Evidence

This request was naturally firmly opposed by the K.A.N.U. and K.A.D.U. delegations, who, notwithstanding their lack of unanimity on other issues, were adamant in refusing to concede any right of separate self-determination to the Somali and associated peoples of the N.F.D. Such a concession, they claimed, would jeopardize the territorial integrity of Kenya and would encourage tribal separatist movements throughout the colony. In assuming this position, the K.A.N.U. leaders were fortified by the knowledge that they enjoyed the support of Ethiopia and that African governments in other territories had little sympathy for the Somali case. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 464

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the broader theme of African territorial integrity versus Pan-Somali Pan-African claims seen across Lewis’s account. — connects to: British reversal on the N.F.D. stemmed from Anglo-Ethiopian relations and Kenyan pressure; N.F.D. Somalis comprised 62 percent and nearly unanimously backed secession; N.F.D. Somalis sought autonomy from Kenya to unite with the Somali Republic — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 463 (+1 more)

Broader Connections