African bodies proposed arbitration or federation instead of backing Somali unification.

Evidence

Over the period between the attainment of independence and the rupture of diplomatic relations with Britain the results were far from encouraging. Although prior to independence, the All-African People’s Conference at its Tunis meeting in January 1960 had passed a favourable resolution on Pan-Somalism, it was this organization’s next, meeting at Cairo, in March of the following year, where the Somali delegates encountered stiff opposition, which set the tone for other all-African occasions. Thus at Monrovia two months later, all that was achieved was a motion urging the Republic and Ethiopia to settle their boundary disputes; and at Belgrade in September, the Somali case again attracted no tangible support. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 491 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

The union of the Protectorate with Somalia, however, was one thing. The further extension of Somali unification to embrace French Somaliland, the Ethiopian Haud and Ogaden, and the Northern Frontier District of Kenya, although boldly enshrined in the Republic’s constitution, was an altogether different matter. Both the Northern Frontier District of Kenya, and the Haud and Ogaden, were part of neighbouring states which had shown no enthusiasm for the Somali cause and could hardly be expected to agree readily to territorial changes which would diminish their size and prestige. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 450 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Somalis framed unification as both Pan-Somali and Pan-African in principle; Somali nationalism reversed the usual African nation-building direction — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 490; Somali irredentism threatened the sanctity of colonial African frontiers — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation…, 490 (+3 more)

Broader Connections