Joining psychoanalysis and neurology remains an unfinished project

Evidence

If this “moment of transition” is now complete, the project of conjoining psychoanalysis and neurology has yet to be accomplished. To integrate psychoanalysis within the history of neurology is at once to insist on the need to renew, or even reform, certain aspects of psychoanalytic theory in light of neurological findings and, inversely, to recognize what a neurology that has entered the “era of subtlety” owes to Freud. — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded, 443

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Psychoanalysis is only a temporary phase awaiting neurological confirmation — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain…, 437; Neuropsychoanalysis is a working discipline rather than a settled science — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain…, 474; Psychoanalysis and neurology can only dialogue after accepting negative plasticity — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain…, 4333 (+3 more)

Broader Connections

• Neuropsychoanalysis is a working discipline rather than a settled science #expands (0.85) — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded, 474
• The neuronal-mental gap needs interpretation to bridge #expands (0.78) — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 206
• Psychoanalysis and neurology can only dialogue after accepting negative plasticity #qualifies (0.75) — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded, 4333
• Neuroscientific findings remain inert without a new understanding of self #complicates (0.72) — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 219
• Neurology cannot explain what makes mental transitions possible #expands (0.70) — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 210