Islamophobic acts are defined by ideological motive, not the act itself

Evidence

It is important to stress however that these events, incidents and occurrences are in isolation not Islamophobic but are instead informed or initiated by an ideological understanding or meaning that is Islamophobic. So for example, the act of spitting at someone is in isolation far from Islamophobic per se but actually spitting on someone because they are Muslim would be something that was informed by the ideological premise of Islamophobia. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 573

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies Allen’s key definitional move — acts count as Islamophobic only via informing ideology, a stance that extends the Runnymede ‘open/closed views’ frame into actions.
  • XREF: connects to: Islamophobia is an ideology, not a set of actions or practices — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 832; Islamophobia is the meaning disseminated about Muslims and Islam rather than any single act — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 818; Exclusionary practices are Islamophobic through their causal origins, not their form — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 804 (+2 more)

Broader Connections