Identity alignment requires perceived sufficiency of similarity rather than actual sameness

Evidence

The term adequation emphasizes the fact that in order for groups or individuals to be positioned as alike, they need not – and in any case cannot – be identical, but must merely be understood as sufficiently similar for current interactional purposes. Thus, differences irrelevant or damaging to ongoing efforts to adequate two people or groups will be downplayed, and similarities viewed as salient to and supportive of the immediate project of identity work will be foregrounded. — Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, Identity and Interaction, 75

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘adequation’ as a key tactic in Bucholtz and Hall’s identity framework.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s broader interest in identity as negotiated in interaction — this is one of the tactical principles against essentialism. — connects to: Perspective-taking shifts perceived similarity only among low group identifiers — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 1098; Social identity complexity splits into quantifiable overlap and perceived similarity components — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 526; Mixed-identity people shift self-categorizations situationally because prototype-similarity assessments stay inconclusive — Anna X. Huang, Jacqueline M. Chen, and Juliane Degner, Being One or the Other, Both or…, 60 (+6 more)
  • FICTION: The insistence that sameness is a pragmatic fiction (‘need not – and in any case cannot – be identical’) is rich material for a character who adopts only the visible trappings of a group identity.

Broader Connections