Identical bank-failure income losses radicalized voters only where media singled out the bank

Evidence

In Table 6 we contrast the differential effects of Danat’s and Dresdner’s presence in more detail, as both banks failed during the crisis. Column (1) demonstrates that the presence of Dresdner Bank has an economically and statistically significant negative effect on city-level incomes. Column (2) shows that it is similar to the impact of Danat – the presence of either failing bank led to a virtually identical decline in city incomes. … The electoral effect, however, was strikingly different: column (3) shows that the presence of Dresdner Bank alone does significantly predict changes in Nazi votes. Once we add danat in column (4) we see that Danat’s presence has a highly significant effect on support for the NSDAP even after accounting for the presence of Dresdner. This pattern holds when we split our sample of cities into those with historically low or high vote shares for anti-Semitic parties (columns 5 and 6) or cities that did not or did experience pogroms (columns 7 and 8): while the effect of Danat exposure on support for the NSDAP was exacerbated in historically anti-Semitic cities, no such pattern is discernible for Dresdner Bank. — Sebastian Doerr et al., Financial Crises and Political…, 123

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Column 3 text reads oddly — ā€˜does significantly predict’ with no negative sign stated; worth verifying the direction and that Dresdner has a null/negative electoral effect.
  • XREF: connects to: An unpublicized bank failure did not radicalize voters despite similar economic damage. — Sebastian Doerr et al., Financial Crises and Political…, 29; Only exposure to Danatbank, not Dresdner, raised Nazi voting despite identical economic losses. — Sebastian Doerr et al., Financial Crises and Political…, 94; The bank crisis radicalized voters beyond what income losses alone can explain — Sebastian Doerr et al., Financial Crises and Political…, 109 (+9 more)

Broader Connections