Horkheimer treated the Institute’s business-friendly turn as temporary camouflage for critical theory.

Evidence

At this period, in which he was on the one hand appearing as a Critical Theorist and on the other trying to make the Institute’s work palatable to business and administrative circles, Horkheimer may have thought that during the setting up of the new Institute this was still a good form of camouflage but that, one day, there would be no need to take it seriously. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 458

Categorization

• XREF: Pays off the earlier chapter’s note that Horkheimer treated accommodation to industry as temporary camouflage. — connects to: Horkheimer treated marketing the Institute to business as temporary camouflage.; Horkheimer treated accommodation to industry as temporary camouflage — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1860; Institutional survival overtook critical theory as Horkheimer’s governing aim — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 519 (+2 more)
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Horkheimer treated marketing the Institute to business as temporary camouflage.; Horkheimer treated accommodation to industry as temporary camouflage — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1860; Institutional survival overtook critical theory as Horkheimer’s governing aim — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 519 (+2 more)

Broader Connections

• Horkheimer treated marketing the Institute to business as temporary camouflage. #corroborates (0.97)
• Horkheimer treated accommodation to industry as temporary camouflage #corroborates (0.95) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 1860