Hegel saw the faith-knowledge quarrel migrate inward into philosophy itself

Evidence

Still, this transposition of the theological into the speculative must be made philosophically explicit. Hegel distinguishes three major stages of the evolution of the relationship between faith and knowledge: (1) faith and knowledge as a harmonious and non-conflictual distinction within theology itself; (2) faith and knowledge as an antagonistic distinction between theology and philosophy; (3) faith and knowledge as a distinction within philosophy itself. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 787

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

• CANDY: Tidy three-stage schema of how an external quarrel becomes an internal one — a neat conceptual anecdote.

Related

• Faith and knowledge relations evolve through three dialectical stages into philosophy (similarity 0.86)
• Hegel makes the believer’s faith repeat kenosis itself (similarity 0.83)
• A philosophy’s future depends on locating the unforeseen question within it. (similarity 0.82)
• Philosophy releases sedimented energy by disrupting habitual familiarity (similarity 0.80)
• Hegel’s philosophy becomes an event when taken to its speculative limit (similarity 0.80)
• Hegel explains Christianity and modern metaphysics of subjectivity as one emergence. (similarity 0.80)
• Hegel reversed his own earlier view that humanity in God is a blemish (similarity 0.80)
• Hegel’s contemporaries already saw Absolute Knowledge as a violent arrest of dialectical mobility (similarity 0.79)
• Enlightenment nihilism is a translation of Protestant religious consciousness, not an escape from it (similarity 0.79)
• Hegel’s anthropological, theological and philosophical material yields a philosophy of the event (similarity 0.79)
• The reason-understanding division replaces the older faith-knowledge opposition (similarity 0.79)
• Modern subjectivity is essentially a philosophical continuation of divine kenosis (similarity 0.79)
• Stressing a philosopher’s originality can inadvertently confirm their conformity to tradition. (similarity 0.79)
• Absolute Knowledge’s stopping role must be necessity, not chance (similarity 0.78)
• Hegel never reconciled the future’s chronological and logical-conceptual senses (similarity 0.78)