Handshake-deal transaction costs are not obviously lower than formal contract costs.

Evidence

One line of analysis used to explain market transactors’ choice between legally enforceable contracts and extralegal contracts focuses on the transaction costs of negotiating and drafting legally enforceable agreements. It is not clear, however, a priori that these costs are necessarily higher than those incurred in the formation of an extralegal contract consummated with a handshake. Because the ability of the promisee to enforce an extralegal contract depends on the posting of a reputation bond — Lisa Bernestein, Opting out of the Legal System, 126

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s own work on infrastructure and informal systems — the reputation bond functions as social infrastructure in the same way root grafts function as botanical infrastructure. — connects to: Contractual commitments shift negotiation costs rather than truly binding anyone — Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 68; Formal agreements can strengthen tacit coordination norms. — Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 605; Private-judge trading systems succeed only when enforcement costs stay low — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 15 (+1 more)

Broader Connections