Gaulle misread the F L N as a conventional insurgency open to compromise.

Evidence

If it was for the future salvation of the army that de Gaulle wanted to be disencumbered of Algeria, then it was for the sake of preserving it intact that he could not risk telling it the whole truth of his intentions. Thus, to save it for a brilliant future that only he could see glimmering in the distance, de Gaulle had—from 1958 onwards—to speak carefully to the army in a special language; or, more crudely put, lie to it for its own good. This seems to be the most fundamental explanation for de Gaulle’s “double-talk”. To some extent he may have deceived himself by it. In formulating his policy for Algeria he seems throughout to have suffered from three basic misconceptions. The first was that his great personal prestige would persuade the Muslim majority to accept his terms. (Whether the pieds noirs would was always of secondary importance to de Gaulle.) But, as he received one snub after another from the F.L.N., his prestige waned until by the end of 1960 it was doubtful whether it could have carried an effective majority. Secondly, he fundamentally misunderstood the nature of the F.L.N., thinking, as a military man himself, that he was dealing with a conventional armed insurrection led by modern Abd-el-Kaders who would sooner or later recognise military defeat and the advantages of sensible compromise. But he could not seem to grasp that his adversaries were ruthless and adroit political revolutionaries, deeply committed to totalitarian principles of “no compromise”. Finally, he somehow persuaded himself that time would wait upon him while he found the correct formula and then imposed peace with it. But time would be wrenched from him. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1158

Categorization

  • XREF: De Gaulle’s three misconceptions parallel the broader pattern of European leaders misreading revolutionary colonial movements, linking to Black Marxism and decolonization histories. — connects to: De Gaulle misjudged the F.L.N.’s political rather than military nature. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 946; De Gaulle’s soldier’s language misread F.L.N. psychology and ensured rejection of his peace offer. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 975
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1158

Broader Connections