Financialization scholarship assumes it is a universal, uniform process

Evidence

Writes Engelen, ‘. . .many scholars have simply assumed that financialization is a universal process, which articulates itself similarly in different institutional contexts and actually causes divergence towards an ideal-typical conceptualization of a financialized economy, which looks surprisingly similar to the picture of the US painted by its liberal critics’ (2008, p. 114). — Natascha van der Zwan, Making Sense of Financialization, 90

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the same critique raised in the author’s own framing at paragraph 88; also connects to debates over ideal types in comparative political economy. — connects to: The financialization literature lacks a unified definition across four competing usages — Greta R. Krippner, The Financialization of the American…, 41; So-called universal scholarship actually reflects imperial national biases — James W. Carey, Communication as Culture- Essays on…, 592; Financialization of households is stratified by class, not uniform — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 21 (+1 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Natascha van der Zwan, Making Sense of Financialization, 90

Broader Connections