Financialization does not yield uniform convergence across national contexts.

Evidence

Some scholars predicted that financialization would end with global convergence on Americanstyle finance capitalism (Coffee 1998). But financialization took on a different character according to local circumstance. Unlike franchise restaurants, financial markets do not come with a handbook that ensures uniformity. For instance, institutional entrepreneurs aiming to transform their domestic economies, e.g., via pension reform, worked through existing arrangements that yielded different outcomes (Dixon & Sorsa 2009). — Gerald F. Davis & Suntae Kim, Financialization of the Economy, 118

Categorization

  • XREF: Parallels the ‘varieties of capitalism’ literature and the ‘grafting’ metaphor from the trees essay — institutions take root differently in local soil. — connects to: Financialization of households is stratified by class, not uniform — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 21; Financial globalization’s effects are mediated by preexisting national institutions. — Gerald F. Davis & Suntae Kim, Financialization of the Economy, 125; Financialization is a political project tied to US hegemony, not a market efficiency outcome. — Natascha van der Zwan, Making Sense of Financialization, 35 (+1 more)