Every act of contention joins program, identity, and standing claims.

Evidence

In each case, the action articulates with a distinctive social and political context. But in each case, we also witness complementary program, identity, and standing claims. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 256

Categorization

• DEFINE: Introduces Tilly’s three-part structure for what contentious performances claim: program (what should be done), identity (who we are), and standing (our right to act).
• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 256
• XREF: connects to: All contentious action reduces to identity, standing, or program claims — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 222; Contentious claims sort into identity, standing, and program, usually building in that order. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 222; Identity, standing, and program claims move independently and can decouple — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1162

Broader Connections

• Contentious claims sort into identity, standing, and program, usually building in that order. #expands (0.92) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 222
• Identity, standing, and program claims move independently and can decouple #complicates (0.85) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1162