Even the most learned, sympathetic Orientalists converged on Islam’s latent inferiority

Evidence

With nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Orientalism, increasing numbers of scholars, authors, and artists were convinced that Muslims belonged to a once great but now separate and intrinsically inferior civilization, one that not only lacked complexity and diversity but also offered little to benefit Western civilization. The fact that the tendency to essentialize Muslims in this way emerged at a time of significant European colonial expansion suggests that Orientalism was neither a disinterested enterprise nor an objective quest for knowledge of non-Western cultures and religions. — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 201 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Renan’s 1883 lecture “Islam and Science” reflects these assumptions, though the achievements of the Enlightenment inform his insights as well. Renan portrays Islam as a monolithic religion possessing a fixed essence and set of cultural traits that make it inferior to European civilization: — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 194 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Nineteenth-century Orientalism essentialized Muslims as intrinsically inferior during colonial expansion. — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 201; Islamophobia is rooted in imperialism and Orientalism; Western conceptions of Muslims as inferior beings arose when European nations were positioned to dominate once-powerful Muslim empires. — On Terrorists and Freedom Fighters; Orientalist discourse was a juncture rather than a continuous line of anti-Islam thought — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 189 (+3 more)

Broader Connections