Colonization was not Islam-specific but Orientalism shaped its distinct form

Evidence

Despite this, colonialism occurred outside of and somewhat arbitrarily to the existence and presence of Islam. Indeed, colonialism was far from being an Islamo-specific process and so extensive areas that were non-Islamic including South and Central America were also colonised. Colonisation was not then unique to Islam or to the Muslim world although it is worth suggesting that because of Orientalism, it might have been that the colonisation of the Muslim world took on a different form and expression. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 195 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

With nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Orientalism, increasing numbers of scholars, authors, and artists were convinced that Muslims belonged to a once great but now separate and intrinsically inferior civilization, one that not only lacked complexity and diversity but also offered little to benefit Western civilization. The fact that the tendency to essentialize Muslims in this way emerged at a time of significant European colonial expansion suggests that Orientalism was neither a disinterested enterprise nor an objective quest for knowledge of non-Western cultures and religions. — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 201 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Orientalism differs from Hellenism by accompanying colonial conquest — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 860; Colonisation was not specific to Islam or the Muslim world — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 195; Orientalist scholarship justified colonization by depicting Muslim men as innately abusive (+7 more)

Broader Connections