European science built directly on Muslim scholarship and Copernicus drew on Arabic sources

Evidence

Islamic and Arabic science scholar George Saliba has demonstrated that not only did science thrive in the Middle Ages in Muslim empires, but the work of Muslim, Persian, and Arab scholars laid the basis for Europe’s Renaissance. Saliba challenges the classical narrative about Arabic and Islamic science, which suggests that Muslim scholars simply translated the great works of antiquity and the contributions of the Persians and Indians, while offering nothing new. He shows how, for instance, Copernicus who advanced the heliocentric view of the solar system didn’t posit his theory in isolation but built on previous work by Arab and Muslim scholars. … He further asserts that it is only if one uses a Eurocentric model where science and religion must battle one another leading to the ultimate triumph of the former to measure other societies that one comes to the conclusion that Islam stifled science and remained intellectually stagnant. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 340

Categorization

  • XREF: Challenges the teleological ‘science versus religion’ narrative, echoing themes from the reader’s knowledge base about how Eurocentric histories erase non-European contributions — parallels Edward Said’s orientalism critique. — connects to: Muslim scholars invented decimal fractions, trigonometry, and the basis for Copernicus. — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 804; Medieval Europe’s intellectual labor was transmission of Arabic-held knowledge rather than invention; Arabic scientific writings served as medieval European textbooks for centuries. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 58 (+8 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines Saliba’s revisionist historiography that overturns the ‘decline of Islamic science after the 11th century’ fabrication.

Broader Connections