Resource rebellions stem from a clash between short-term extractors and long-term residents

Evidence

I would argue, then, that the exponential upsurge in indigenous resource rebellions across the globe during the high age of neoliberalism has resulted largely from a clash of temporal perspectives between the short-termers who arrive (with their official landscape maps) to extract, despoil, and depart and the long-termers who must live inside the ecological aftermath and must therefore weigh wealth differently in time’s scales. In the pages that follow, I will highlight and explore resource rebellions against developer-dispossessors who descend from other time zones to impose on habitable environments unsustainable calculations about what constitutes the duration of human gain. Change is a cultural constant but the pace of change is not. Hence the temporal contests over how to sustain, regenerate, exhaust, or obliterate the landscape as resource become critical. — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 51

Categorization

  • XREF: The temporal clash echoes Grafting & Growth’s concern with slow time against fast capital—trees as long-termers versus extractors. — connects to: Environmental conflict arises when official extraction-driven landscapes override vernacular community maps — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 50; Extractive theft without basic infrastructure delivery provokes rebellion — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 113; Resource depletion, distrust, and ethnic politics jointly trigger social unrest — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 1163 (+5 more)

Broader Connections