Envelope-following response measures capture hearing aspects beyond the audiometric threshold

Evidence

There were no significant correlations between the DPOAE measures and the EFR measures indicating that the EFR measures at 70 dB SPL reflect more aspects of hearing loss than captured by auditory threshold measures alone. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 5885

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 5885
• XREF: connects to: Békésy audiometry derives hearing thresholds from button-press tracking of a swept tone; Cochlear hearing loss spares the binaural processing of envelope cues — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 822; Audiometric pure-tone thresholds predict speech intelligibility even after sensitivity adjustment (+4 more)

Broader Connections

• Reaction time measures loudness across the full hearing range #expands (0.80) — Jennifer Lentz, Psychoacoustics- Perception of Normal…, 792
• Cochlear hearing loss spares the binaural processing of envelope cues #expands (0.75) — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 822
• Audiometric pure-tone thresholds predict speech intelligibility even after sensitivity adjustment #complicates (0.75)
• Auditory-model difference measures predict audible quality degradation #corroborates (0.75)
• Hearing thresholds are clinically tested at octave-spaced frequencies covering the speech range #qualifies (0.75)
• Auditory sensitivity varies nonuniformly across the frequency range #complicates (0.72) — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 648