English-writing non-Western intellectuals get elevated into representatives of whole continents

Evidence

One consequence, then, is that the few writers who happen to write in English are valorized beyond measure. Witness, for example, the characterization of Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children in the New York Times as ‘a Continent finding its voice’ – as if one has no voice if one does not speak in English. Or Richard Poirier’s praise for Edward Said in Raritan which now adorns the back cover of a recent book of Said’s: ‘It is Said’s great accomplishment that thanks to his book, Palestinians will never be lost to history.’ This is the upside-down world of the camera obscura: not that Said’s vision is itself framed by the Palestinian experience, but that Palestine would have no place in history without Said’s book! The retribution visited upon the head of an Asian, an African, an Arab intellectual who is of any consequence and writes in English is that he or she is immediately elevated to the lonely splendour of a representative – of a race, a continent, a civilization, even the ‘Third World’. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 153

The retribution visited upon the head of an Asian, an African, an Arab intellectual who is of any consequence and writes in English is that he or she is immediately elevated to the lonely splendour of a representativeof a race, a continent, a civilization, even the ‘Third World’ It is in this general context that a ‘cognitive theory of third-world literature’ based upon what is currently available in languages of the metropolitan countries becomes, to my mind, an alarming undertaking. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 378

Categorization

  • CANDY: The Poirier/Said back-cover quote inversion — ‘Palestine would have no place in history without Said’s book’ — is a sharp, quotable one-liner contrast between what the praise claims and what it reveals.
  • SEED: Strong angle for an essay on how Anglophone canonization rebrands authors like Rushdie, Said, and later Adichie or Yanagihara as emissaries of entire geographies.
  • XREF: This is the materialist/structural critique that grounds the reader’s research: the representative-syndrome is a structural effect of translation and publishing markets, not of any individual’s essentialism. — connects to: Anglophone third-world intellectuals are elevated into representatives of entire civilizations.; Third-world writers have achieved real canonical standing in US academia. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 440; Translated non-Western writing is absorbed through a single representative voice — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 377
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Nations, Classes, Literatures, 153; Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 378