Engels himself admitted that Marxism’s economic reductionism was partly his and Marx’s fault

Evidence

Marx’s “materialism” adds to this premise at least one other requirement: that the relationship must be thought within determinate historical conditions. It must be made historically specific . It is this second requirement which distinguishes a historical materialist theory of human society and culture from, say, a materialism grounded in the simple fact of man’s physical nature (a “vulgar,” or as Marx calls it, an undialectical materialism) or one which gives the determining instance to technological development alone. What Karl Korsch, among others, has called “the principle of historical specificity” in Marx’s materialism is clearly enunciated in The German Ideology (where Marx’s theory becomes, for the first time, fully “historical”) and afterward in his mature work. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 881 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Engels completed rather than developed Marx’s unfinished theoretical legacy; Engels’s defenses of Marxism were trapped by the very concepts they defended; Marxism is not economic reductionism and requires attending to ideas in their own terms (+3 more)

Broader Connections