Distinction suppresses similarities just as adequation suppresses differences

Evidence

The counterpart of adequation, distinction, focuses on the identity relation of differentiation. The overwhelming majority of sociocultural linguistic research on identity has emphasized this relation, both because social differentiation is a highly visible process and because language is an especially potent resource for producing it in a variety of ways. Just as adequation relies on the suppression of social differences that might disrupt a seamless representation of similarity, distinction depends on the suppression of similarities that might undermine the construction of difference. — Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, Identity and Interaction, 80

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Pairs distinction as a negative mirror of adequation — both operate by selective prominence and suppression of identity-relevant features.
  • XREF: Mirrors your five-principles framework: distinction is the negation side of the similitude/difference axis Bucholtz & Hall derive. — connects to: Meaning arises from relations between differences, not content resemblance — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 359; One utterance can simultaneously produce adequation and distinction — Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, Identity and Interaction: A…, 81; Imitation and distinction operate as complementary forces rather than opposites — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 165 (+7 more)

Broader Connections