Digital tools enable new decentralized forms of commons peer production.

Evidence

Commons organizing is based on a decentralized and communitarian form of working in common. In the twenty-first century, this traditional form of organizing has acquired new tools for decentralized task division and allocation which is only possible with today’s new digital tools (internet, sharing platforms and blockchain) that enhance new forms of peer production and sharing. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 193

Categorization

• DEFINE: Situates commons organizing between its decentralized communitarian roots and its digital augmentations (sharing platforms, blockchain), useful as a working definition.
• QUESTION: Whether blockchain counts as enabling ‘peer production’ rather than merely exchange is a live question worth chasing into the distributed-ledger literature.
• corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 193
• XREF: connects to: Commons organizing fuses ethical common-good production with peer sharing. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 151; Community-scale commons experiments can scale outward into large networks. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 173; Digital voluntary communities can produce collective goods unmet by states and markets. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 188 (+3 more)

Related

• Digital voluntary communities can produce collective goods unmet by states and markets. (similarity 0.88)
• Commons organizing fuses ethical common-good production with peer sharing. (similarity 0.85)
• Contemporary common goods extend beyond natural resources into digitally and urbanly produced domains. (similarity 0.83)
• Community-scale commons experiments can scale outward into large networks. (similarity 0.82)
• Commons function as social resources binding communities together, not just property rights. (similarity 0.80)
• The internet enabled a shift to commons-based decentralized non-market production (similarity 0.79)
• Commons organizing names the process by which communities jointly produce and govern common goods. (similarity 0.79)
• Commons are best understood as dynamic processes of commoning, not static resources. (similarity 0.79)
• Communities can act collectively as a single entrepreneur and enterprise. (similarity 0.78)

Broader Connections

• Digital platform enclosure is continuous with historical land enclosure, transforming relational life into extraction #complicates (0.75) — Naomi Klein, Doppelganger, 126
• Commons function as social resources binding communities together, not just property rights. #expands (0.72) — Emil Sandström and Ann-Kristin Ekman and Karl-Johan Lindholm, Commoning in the periphery – The role…, 10