Defining Islamophobia matters only insofar as it enables systematic comparison.

Evidence

Putting the Concept of Islamophobia to Use: Comparative and Causal Analysis Given the inherent difficulties in doing so, is it worth the effort to establish a definition and concrete measures of Islamophobia? It is both intellectually interesting and analytically important to bring rigor and clarity to a vague concept. But there is little point to this—at least for social scientists—if the goal is purely theoretical. Developing Islamophobia as a clear concept, however, is also the foundation for systematic comparison, and systematic comparison is the key to accurate causal analysis. — Erik Bleich, What Is Islamophobia and How Much Is…, 60

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly engages Bleich’s methodological stance against Runnymede’s politically motivated definition and Halliday’s terminological critique — this is the definition-as-analytical-tool camp. — connects to: Precise definitions of Islamophobia enable systematic cross-time and cross-group comparisons. — Erik Bleich, What Is Islamophobia and How Much Is…, 61; The term Islamophobia demands a better-grounded, contestable definition — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 102; Survey indicators of Islamophobia need comparison baselines to isolate the Muslim component. — Erik Bleich, What Is Islamophobia and How Much Is…, 50 (+3 more)
  • SEED: Could seed an essay on how concept definition in social science is always instrumental — theorized vs. operationalized definitions.
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections